Seeing as sd_wait_data_idle() returns void and only a very specific
read value is checked, there doesn't seem to be a good reason to
check the return value of rtsx_pci_read_register().  So remove
the assignment and definition of 'err'.

Squashes the following W=1 kernel build warning:

 drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_pci_sdmmc.c: In function ‘sd_wait_data_idle’:
 drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_pci_sdmmc.c:678:6: warning: variable ‘err’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
 678 | int err, i;
 | ^~~

Cc: Wei WANG <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <redacted>
---
 drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_pci_sdmmc.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_pci_sdmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_pci_sdmmc.c
index 5a71f6678fd3a..dc0dbd64a2a78 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_pci_sdmmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_pci_sdmmc.c

@@ -675,11 +675,11 @@ static u8 sd_search_final_phase(struct realtek_pci_sdmmc *host, u32 phase_map)
 
 static void sd_wait_data_idle(struct realtek_pci_sdmmc *host)
 {
-	int err, i;
+	int i;
 	u8 val = 0;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
-		err = rtsx_pci_read_register(host->pcr, SD_DATA_STATE, &val);
+		rtsx_pci_read_register(host->pcr, SD_DATA_STATE, &val);
 		if (val & SD_DATA_IDLE)
 			return;
 

-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel