On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 06:04:01PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Fold the misaligned u64 workarounds into the main quotactl flow instead
of implementing a separate compat syscall handler.
I can live with that (and drop the local quota-related stuff from
copy_in_user/compat_alloc_user_space elimination series). One question,
though:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+static int compat_copy_fs_qfilestat(struct compat_fs_qfilestat __user *to,
+ struct fs_qfilestat *from)
+{
+ if (copy_to_user(to, from, sizeof(*to)) ||
+ put_user(from->qfs_nextents, &to->qfs_nextents))
+ return -EFAULT;
+ return 0;
+}
do we have any need of that put_user()? Note that you don't even call
that thing unless compat_need_64bit_alignment_fixup() is true. And AFAICS
all such cases are little-endian...
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel