Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] drivers: input: misc: Add mtk vibrator driver
From: Pavel Machek <hidden>
Date: 2020-06-16 11:02:33
Also in:
linux-input, linux-mediatek
Hi!
+static int mt_vibra_parse_dt(struct device *dev,
+ struct reg_vibr_config *vibr_conf)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ if (device_property_read_u32(dev, "min-limit",
+ &vibr_conf->min_limit))
+ vibr_conf->min_limit = DEFAULT_MIN_LIMIT;
+ vibr_conf->min_limit = max_t(unsigned int,
+ vibr_conf->min_limit, DEFAULT_MIN_LIMIT);
+
+ if (device_property_read_u32(dev, "max-limit",
+ &vibr_conf->max_limit))
+ vibr_conf->max_limit = 0;Is max_limit useful? Do you enforce it in useful way?
+ if (!vibr_conf->max_limit &&
+ vibr_conf->max_limit < vibr_conf->min_limit) {
+ dev_err(dev, "error load dts: get error limitation(min > max)\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }Condition looks wrong.
+static struct attribute *sysfs_attrs[] = { + &dev_attr_activate.attr, +
&dev_attr_state.attr, + &dev_attr_duration.attr, + NULL, +}; + +static struct
attribute_group vibr_group = { + .attrs = sysfs_attrs, +}; + +static int
regulator_oc_event(struct notifier_block *nb, + unsigned long event, void *data) +{ + Do you need custom attributes? Why? Where is their documentation? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel