Re: [RFC PATCH V4 0/4] media: platform: Add support for Face Detection (FD) on mt8183 SoC
From: Jerry-ch Chen <hidden>
Date: 2020-06-30 14:11:00
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-media, linux-mediatek
Hi Tomasz, On Thu, 2020-05-21 at 18:38 +0000, Tomasz Figa wrote:
Hi Jerry, On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 11:45:37PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:quoted
Hi Jerry, On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 4:03 AM Jerry-ch Chen [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Hi Laurent, Tomasz, Matthias, gentle ping for this patch set, If no new comments, I would like to send a newer version.Sorry, I still haven't had a chance to look at the series, so feel free to send a new version and I will take a look at the new one.Finally found some time to review the series. Again sorry for the delay and thanks for your patience. Some general comments: 1) The metadata format FourCC should be added in a separate patch, together with documentation for it. 2) Control IDs, structs used by the userspace, etc. should be defined in a header under include/uapi/linux. Please also check my replies to particular patches for further comments. Best regards, Tomasz
Appreciate for your reply, So far, I've locally created an uapi header: include/uapi/linux/mtk_fd_40.h which provides some values, control ids, and the definitions of structures that would be needed by user of mtk_fd_40 driver. In addition, I also provide a MACRO as example in comments that can extract the struct member with bit length and offset definitions(eliminate the bit-fields). Also, I would like to rename struct fd_user_output with struct mtk_fd_hw_result. I worry fd_user_output would be a confusing name. I will add them in a separate patch in next version. I am still working on the documentation, which might be Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/pixfmt-meta-mtk-fd-40.rst. Refering the other pixfmt-*.rst files, I will try to provide the flat-table of the metadata with the structure of the mtk_fd_hw_result. I am confusing that should I remain the name with -40 in the tail of rst file? Since I think the layout of metadata might be different in the future mtk fd drivers. Maybe they create a new one or should they update the rst file when they are upstreaming? Other comments are almost fixed, I will inform you by this mail thread as soon as I finish the documentation of fd metadata format. Sorry for the late response, Thanks and Best Regards, Jerry _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel