On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 18:52:25 +0100 Catalin Marinas [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
For arm64 MTE support it is necessary to be able to mark pages that
contain user space visible tags that will need to be saved/restored e.g.
when swapped out.
To support this add a new arch specific flag (PG_ARCH_2) that arch code
can opt into using ARCH_USES_PG_ARCH_2.
...
--- a/fs/proc/page.c
+++ b/fs/proc/page.c
@@ -217,6 +217,9 @@ u64 stable_page_flags(struct page *page)
u |= kpf_copy_bit(k, KPF_PRIVATE_2, PG_private_2);
u |= kpf_copy_bit(k, KPF_OWNER_PRIVATE, PG_owner_priv_1);
u |= kpf_copy_bit(k, KPF_ARCH, PG_arch_1);
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_USES_PG_ARCH_2
+ u |= kpf_copy_bit(k, KPF_ARCH_2, PG_arch_2);
+#endif
Do we need CONFIG_ARCH_USES_PG_ARCH_2? What would be the downside to
giving every architecture a PG_arch_2, but only arm64 uses it (at
present)?
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel