Hi Alain,

Ok, understood. Fine for me that way as well. I am just a little worrying that
the "host-notify" can now be present in both controller AND slave nodes
and might be a bit hard to understand. At the same time I don't have a better
proposal for naming the binding for the controller.

It is a valid concern, maybe we could name the binding for the host
"enable-host-notify"?

Please do not consider serie v2 I just posted few days ago and I will
post a serie v3 updating the binding information and using the host-notify
binding in the i2c-stm32f7 driver.

I also have an idea for the SMBusAlert topic, hopefully I can come up
with a summary later today.

All the best,

   Wolfram