[PATCH V2] scsi: powertec: Fix different dev_id between 'request_irq()' and 'free_irq()'
From: Christophe JAILLET <hidden>
Date: 2020-06-26 04:00:02
Also in:
kernel-janitors, linux-scsi, lkml
Subsystem:
arm/riscpc architecture, scsi subsystem, the rest · Maintainers:
Russell King, "James E.J. Bottomley", "Martin K. Petersen", Linus Torvalds
The dev_id used in 'request_irq()' and 'free_irq()' should match.
So use 'info' in both cases.
Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <redacted>
---
V2: update free_irq instead of request_irq in order not to obviously break
code
---
drivers/scsi/arm/powertec.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/arm/powertec.c b/drivers/scsi/arm/powertec.c
index 772a13e5fd91..d99ef014528e 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/arm/powertec.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/arm/powertec.c@@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ static int powertecscsi_probe(struct expansion_card *ec, if (info->info.scsi.dma != NO_DMA) free_dma(info->info.scsi.dma); - free_irq(ec->irq, host); + free_irq(ec->irq, info); out_release: fas216_release(host);
--
2.25.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel