Re: [PATCH 3/8] backlight: ili922x: Add missing kerneldoc descriptions for CHECK_FREQ_REG() args
From: Lee Jones <hidden>
Date: 2020-06-25 10:33:41
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-fbdev, lkml, stable
On Thu, 25 Jun 2020, Daniel Thompson wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 03:57:16PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:quoted
Kerneldoc syntax is used, but not complete. Descriptions required. Prevents warnings like: drivers/video/backlight/ili922x.c:116: warning: Function parameter or member 's' not described in 'CHECK_FREQ_REG' drivers/video/backlight/ili922x.c:116: warning: Function parameter or member 'x' not described in 'CHECK_FREQ_REG' Cc: <redacted> Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <redacted> Cc: Software Engineering <redacted> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <redacted> --- drivers/video/backlight/ili922x.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/ili922x.c b/drivers/video/backlight/ili922x.c index 9c5aa3fbb2842..8cb4b9d3c3bba 100644 --- a/drivers/video/backlight/ili922x.c +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/ili922x.c@@ -107,6 +107,8 @@ * lower frequency when the registers are read/written. * The macro sets the frequency in the spi_transfer structure if * the frequency exceeds the maximum value. + * @s: pointer to controller side proxy for an SPI slave deviceWhat's wrong with "a pointer to an SPI device"? I am aware, having looked it up to find out what the above actually means, that this is how struct spi_device is described in its own kernel doc but quoting at that level of detail of both overkill and confusing.
I figured that using the official description would be better than making something up. However if you think it's better to KISS, then I can change it. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel