Re: [PATCH v4 3/7] iommu/mediatek: Set MISC_CTRL register
From: chao hao <hidden>
Date: 2020-06-24 06:40:46
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-iommu, linux-mediatek, lkml
On Sat, 2020-06-20 at 10:03 +0800, Yong Wu wrote:
Hi Chao, On Thu, 2020-06-18 at 19:49 +0800, chao hao wrote:quoted
On Wed, 2020-06-17 at 11:34 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:[snip]quoted
quoted
quoted
#define REG_MMU_MISC_CTRL 0x048 +#define F_MMU_IN_ORDER_WR_EN (BIT(1) | BIT(17)) +#define F_MMU_STANDARD_AXI_MODE_BIT (BIT(3) | BIT(19)) + #define REG_MMU_DCM_DIS 0x050 #define REG_MMU_CTRL_REG 0x110@@ -578,6 +581,14 @@ static int mtk_iommu_hw_init(const struct mtk_iommu_data *data) writel_relaxed(0, data->base + REG_MMU_MISC_CTRL); } + if (data->plat_data->has_misc_ctrl) {That's confusing. We renamed the register to misc_ctrl, but it's present in all SoCs. We should find a better name for this flag to describe what the hardware supports.ok, thanks for you advice, I will rename it in next version. ex:has_perf_req(has performance requirement)quoted
Regards, Matthiasquoted
+ /* For mm_iommu, it can improve performance by the setting */ + regval = readl_relaxed(data->base + REG_MMU_MISC_CTRL); + regval &= ~F_MMU_STANDARD_AXI_MODE_BIT; + regval &= ~F_MMU_IN_ORDER_WR_EN;Note: mt2712 also is MISC_CTRL register, but it don't use this in_order setting. As commented in v3. 0x48 is either STANDARD_AXI_MODE or MISC_CTRL register. No need two flags(reset_axi/has_xx) for it. something like: regval = readl_relaxed(data->base + REG_MMU_MISC_CTRL); if (reset_axi) { regval = 0; } else { /* MISC_CTRL */ if (!apu[1]) regval &= ~F_MMU_STANDARD_AXI_MODE_BIT; if (out_order_en) regval &= ~F_MMU_IN_ORDER_WR_EN; } writel_relaxed(regval, data->base + REG_MMU_MISC_CTRL); [1] Your current patch doesn't support apu-iommu, thus, add it when necessary.
ok, the patchset don't need to "if (!apu[1])", I will fix it in next version. thanks
quoted
quoted
quoted
+ writel_relaxed(regval, data->base + REG_MMU_MISC_CTRL); + } + if (devm_request_irq(data->dev, data->irq, mtk_iommu_isr, 0, dev_name(data->dev), (void *)data)) { writel_relaxed(0, data->base + REG_MMU_PT_BASE_ADDR);diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h index 1b6ea839b92c..d711ac630037 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ struct mtk_iommu_plat_data { /* HW will use the EMI clock if there isn't the "bclk". */ bool has_bclk; + bool has_misc_ctrl; bool has_vld_pa_rng; bool reset_axi; unsigned char larbid_remap[MTK_LARB_NR_MAX];
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel