Re: [PATCH v3 22/25] clk: bcm: rpi: Give firmware clocks a name
From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <hidden>
Date: 2020-06-05 12:49:30
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, 2020-05-27 at 17:45 +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
We've registered the firmware clocks using their ID as name, but it's much more convenient to register them using their proper name. Since the firmware doesn't provide it, we have to duplicate it. Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <redacted> --- drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c index 8d3acf3ee053..cee634cb5323 100644--- a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c +++ b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c@@ -36,6 +36,23 @@ enum rpi_firmware_clk_id { RPI_FIRMWARE_NUM_CLK_ID, }; +static char *rpi_firmware_clk_names[] = { + [RPI_FIRMWARE_EMMC_CLK_ID] = "emmc", + [RPI_FIRMWARE_UART_CLK_ID] = "uart", + [RPI_FIRMWARE_ARM_CLK_ID] = "arm", + [RPI_FIRMWARE_CORE_CLK_ID] = "core", + [RPI_FIRMWARE_V3D_CLK_ID] = "v3d", + [RPI_FIRMWARE_H264_CLK_ID] = "h264", + [RPI_FIRMWARE_ISP_CLK_ID] = "isp", + [RPI_FIRMWARE_SDRAM_CLK_ID] = "sdram", + [RPI_FIRMWARE_PIXEL_CLK_ID] = "pixel", + [RPI_FIRMWARE_PWM_CLK_ID] = "pwm", + [RPI_FIRMWARE_HEVC_CLK_ID] = "hevc", + [RPI_FIRMWARE_EMMC2_CLK_ID] = "emmc2", + [RPI_FIRMWARE_M2MC_CLK_ID] = "m2mc", + [RPI_FIRMWARE_PIXEL_BVB_CLK_ID] = "pixel-bvb", +}; + #define RPI_FIRMWARE_STATE_ENABLE_BIT BIT(0) #define RPI_FIRMWARE_STATE_WAIT_BIT BIT(1)@@ -343,7 +360,9 @@ static struct clk_hw *raspberrypi_clk_register(structraspberrypi_clk *rpi, data->rpi = rpi; data->id = id; - init.name = devm_kasprintf(rpi->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "fw-clk-%u", id); + init.name = devm_kasprintf(rpi->dev, GFP_KERNEL, + "fw-clk-%s", + rpi_firmware_clk_names[id]); init.ops = &raspberrypi_firmware_clk_ops; init.flags = CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE;@@ -367,8 +386,8 @@ static struct clk_hw *raspberrypi_clk_register(structraspberrypi_clk *rpi, return ERR_PTR(ret); } - dev_info(rpi->dev, "Clock %d frequency range: min %u, max %u\n", - id, min_rate, max_rate); + dev_info(rpi->dev, "Clock %s frequency range: min %u, max %u\n", + rpi_firmware_clk_names[id], min_rate, max_rate);
I belive this might change. Otherwise: Acked-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <redacted> Regards, Nicolas