Re: RFC: Adding arch-specific user ABI documentation in linux-man
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Date: 2020-05-05 12:44:28
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-man
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Date: 2020-05-05 12:44:28
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-man
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 11:44:55AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
Michael has been nagging me on and off about that for, what, 10 years now? I would therefore be very much in favour of having our ptrace extensions documented! We could even put this stuff under Documentation/arm64/man/ if it's deemed too CPU-specific for the man-pages project, but my preference would still be for it to be hosted there alongside all the other man pages.
Stuffing random things into the kernel tree is painful for some people. For example, if you cross-build your kernel, then the stuff in the tools/ subdirectory is totally useless (I think everything except perf) because you can't build it. Let's stop making the mistake of constantly shoving stuff into the kernel source tree. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 10.2Mbps down 587kbps up _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel