Re: [PATCH RFCv2 0/9] kvm/arm64: Support Async Page Fault
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Date: 2020-05-27 07:48:32
Also in:
kvmarm, lkml
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Date: 2020-05-27 07:48:32
Also in:
kvmarm, lkml
On 2020-05-27 03:39, Gavin Shan wrote:
Hi Mark,
[...]
quoted
Can you run tests with a real workload? For example, a kernel build inside the VM?Yeah, I agree it's far from a realistic workload. However, it's the test case which was suggested when async page fault was proposed from day one, according to the following document. On the page#34, you can see the benchmark, which is similar to what we're doing. https://www.linux-kvm.org/images/a/ac/2010-forum-Async-page-faults.pdf
My own question is whether this even makes any sense 10 years later. The HW has massively changed, and this adds a whole lot of complexity to both the hypervisor and the guest. It also plays very ugly games with the exception model, which doesn't give me the warm fuzzy feeling that it's going to be great.
Ok. I will test with the workload to build kernel or another better one to represent the case.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel