On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 09:34:10AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 9:07 AM Sudeep Holla [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 11:54:16PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

quoted

On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 11:29 PM Will Deacon [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Mon, 18 May 2020 10:12:15 +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:

quoted

This patch series adds support for SMCCCv1.2 ARCH_SOC_ID.
This doesn't add other changes added in SMCCC v1.2 yet. They will
follow these soon along with its first user SPCI/PSA-FF.

This is tested using upstream TF-A + the patch[3] fixing the original
implementation there.

[...]

Applied to arm64 (for-next/smccc), thanks!

[1/7] firmware: smccc: Add HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY to identify SMCCC v1.1 and above
      https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/e5bfb21d98b6
[2/7] firmware: smccc: Update link to latest SMCCC specification
      https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/15c704ab6244
[3/7] firmware: smccc: Add the definition for SMCCCv1.2 version/error codes
      https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/0441bfe7f00a
[4/7] firmware: smccc: Drop smccc_version enum and use ARM_SMCCC_VERSION_1_x instead
      https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/ad5a57dfe434
[5/7] firmware: smccc: Refactor SMCCC specific bits into separate file
      https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/f2ae97062a48
[6/7] firmware: smccc: Add function to fetch SMCCC version
      https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/a4fb17465182
[7/7] firmware: smccc: Add ARCH_SOC_ID support
      https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/ce6488f0ce09

Arnd -- Sudeep's reply to you about the sysfs groups seemed reasonable to me,
but please shout if you'd rather I dropped this in order to pursue an
alternative approach.

I missed the reply earlier, thanks for pointing me to it again.

I'm not entirely convinced, but don't revert it for now because of that,
I assume we can find a solution.

I liked your idea of making this generic and hardcode values if required
for other drivers. I will take a look at that/

quoted

However, please have a look at the build failure report for patch 5
and fix it if you can see what went wrong.

Any pointers for that failure ? I seem to have missed them. I pushed
branch couple of times to my tree but got build success both times.
Any specific config or compilers ?

See below for the reply from the 0day build bot to your email. It seems it
was not sent to the mailing list, but you were on Cc. Looking at it now,
the fix should be trivial.

Ah, clang it is. I must start building with clang regularly.
Thanks for pointing it out. Somehow few of these kbuild-bot emails
has been marked junk last few days. Sorry for the noise.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel