Re: [PATCH v1 2/6] arm/smmu: Add auxiliary domain support for arm-smmuv2
From: Jordan Crouse <hidden>
Date: 2020-03-19 15:23:35
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-iommu, lkml
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 04:43:07PM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 3:48 PM Will Deacon [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 03:16:06PM -0700, Jordan Crouse wrote:quoted
Support auxiliary domains for arm-smmu-v2 to initialize and support multiple pagetables for a single SMMU context bank. Since the smmu-v2 hardware doesn't have any built in support for switching the pagetable base it is left as an exercise to the caller to actually use the pagetable. Aux domains are supported if split pagetable (TTBR1) support has been enabled on the master domain. Each auxiliary domain will reuse the configuration of the master domain. By default the a domain with TTBR1 support will have the TTBR0 region disabled so the first attached aux domain will enable the TTBR0 region in the hardware and conversely the last domain to be detached will disable TTBR0 translations. All subsequent auxiliary domains create a pagetable but not touch the hardware. The leaf driver will be able to query the physical address of the pagetable with the DOMAIN_ATTR_PTBASE attribute so that it can use the address with whatever means it has to switch the pagetable base. Following is a pseudo code example of how a domain can be created /* Check to see if aux domains are supported */ if (iommu_dev_has_feature(dev, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_AUX)) { iommu = iommu_domain_alloc(...); if (iommu_aux_attach_device(domain, dev)) return FAIL; /* Save the base address of the pagetable for use by the driver iommu_domain_get_attr(domain, DOMAIN_ATTR_PTBASE, &ptbase); }I'm not really understanding what the pagetable base gets used for here and, to be honest with you, the whole thing feels like a huge layering violation with the way things are structured today. Why doesn't the caller just interface with io-pgtable directly? Finally, if we need to support context-switching TTBR0 for a live domain then that code really needs to live inside the SMMU driver because the ASID and TLB management necessary to do that safely doesn't belong anywhere else.Hi Will, We do in fact need live domain switching, that is really the whole point. The GPU CP (command processor/parser) is directly updating TTBR0 and triggering TLB flush, asynchronously from the CPU.
Right. This is entirely done in hardware with a GPU that has complete access to the context bank registers. All the driver does is send the PTBASE to the command stream see [1] and especially [2] (look for CP_SMMU_TABLE_UPDATE). As for interacting with the io-pgtable directly I would love to do that but it would need some new infrastructure to either pull the io-pgtable from the aux domain or to create an io-pgtable ourselves and pass it for use by the aux domain. I'm not sure if that is better for the layering violation.
And I think the answer about ASID is easy (on current hw).. it must be zero[*].
Right now the GPU microcode still uses TLBIALL. I want to assign each new aux domain its own ASID in the hopes that we could some day change that but for now having a uinque ASID doesn't help. Jordan [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/351089/ [2] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/351090/ -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel