On Thu, 2020-03-12 at 07:44 +0000, Lee Jones wrote:

On Wed, 11 Mar 2020, Hsin-Hsiung Wang wrote:

quoted

From: Ran Bi <redacted>

This add support for the MediaTek MT6358 RTC. Driver using
compatible data to store different RTC_WRTGR address offset.
This replace RTC_WRTGR to RTC_WRTGR_MT6323 in mt6323-poweroff
driver which only needed by armv7 CPU without ATF.

Signed-off-by: Ran Bi <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Hsin-Hsiung Wang <redacted>
---
 drivers/power/reset/mt6323-poweroff.c |  2 +-
 drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c              | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 include/linux/mfd/mt6397/rtc.h        |  9 ++++++++-
 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

<...>

quoted

 
 #define RTC_IRQ_STA            0x0002
 #define RTC_IRQ_STA_AL         BIT(0)

@@ -65,6 +67,10 @@
 #define MTK_RTC_POLL_DELAY_US  10
 #define MTK_RTC_POLL_TIMEOUT   (jiffies_to_usecs(HZ))
 
+struct mtk_rtc_data {
+	u32			wrtgr;
+};

Do you expect to add more properties to this struct?

If not, it seems a bit overkill.

Yes, we would add more properties here in future patches.

quoted

 struct mt6397_rtc {
 	struct device           *dev;
 	struct rtc_device       *rtc_dev;

@@ -74,6 +80,7 @@ struct mt6397_rtc {
 	struct regmap           *regmap;
 	int                     irq;
 	u32                     addr_base;
+	const struct mtk_rtc_data *data;

'data' is a terrible variable name.

Why do you need to store this?

It's one variable which is used once AFAICT.

I would rename 'data' to 'config'.

This struct will be extended in future patches to achieve more PMIC chip
compatibility.

quoted

 };
 
 #endif /* _LINUX_MFD_MT6397_RTC_H_ */

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel