RE: [PATCH V4 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: add smc/hvc transport
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Date: 2020-03-06 08:07:25
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: add smc/hvc transport On 3/5/20 8:06 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:quoted
On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 11:25:35AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote: [...]quoted
quoted
Yes, this may fix the issue. However I would like to know if we need to support multiple channels/shared memory simultaneously. It is fair requirement and may need some work which should be fine.Do you have any suggestions? Currently I have not worked out an good solution.TBH, I haven't given it a much thought. I would like to know if people are happy with just one SMC channel for SCMI or do they need more ? If they need it, we can try to solve it. Otherwise, what you have will suffice IMO.On our platforms we have one channel/shared memory area/mailbox instance for all standard SCMI protocols, and we have a separate channel/shared memory area/mailbox driver instance for a proprietary one. They happen to have difference throughput requirements, hence the split. If I read Peng's submission correctly, it seems to me that the usage model described before is still fine.
Thanks. Sudeep, Then should I repost with the global mutex added? Thanks, Peng.
-- Florian
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel