Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 3 authors, 2020-02-26

Re: [PATCH 0/2] rewrite mtk-quadspi spi-nor driver with spi-mem

From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Date: 2020-02-26 11:36:14
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-mediatek, linux-spi, lkml

On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 09:31:33AM +0800, Chuanhong Guo wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 1:31 AM Rob Herring [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
You should should really only need 'spi-max-frequency' if the max freq
is less than the minimum of the host and device max freq.
But current spi framework forces that a "spi-max-frequency" property
is present. [0]
Should we patch spi framework then?
That's one option, yes.  As far as I can tell the bindings have always
required an explicit frequency specified in the bindings but I've no
idea why.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help