Hello Mark,

On Mon, 2020-02-24 at 11:53 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:

On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 09:36:10AM +0200, Matti Vaittinen wrote:

quoted

Rename the "regulator_linear_range" to more generic linear_range
as a first step towards converting the "regulator_linear_range"
to common helpers.

Doesn't this introduce a build break when applied by itself?  Patches
should be bisectable, if you want to split things up you should
introduce the new API then use it.

Uh, I need to double check but this shouldn't cause build break as only
the name of the struct is changed - and I intended to change it both in
regulator header and in all of the drivers using it at same time. Or
did I do some brainfart here?

I just wanted to minimize the changes in patch with the widest
audience.

Oh, after rebasing to linux  5.6-rc2 I see that there are few new users
of regulator_linear_range (I should have known that...) - natuarlly all
of the users need to be covered before applying this.

Br,
	Matti Vaittinen
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel