Quoting Matthias Brugger and Stephen Boyd wrote:

Quoting Matthias Brugger (2020-02-18 08:45:42)

quoted

On 18/02/2020 05:12, Macpaul Lin wrote:

quoted

On Sat, 2020-02-15 at 02:47 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:

Hi Stephen,

quoted

Hi Stephen,

On 13/02/2020 00:44, Stephen Boyd wrote:

quoted

Quoting Macpaul Lin (2020-02-07 01:20:43)

quoted

This patch adds basic SoC support for Mediatek's new 8-core SoC,
MT6765, which is mainly for smartphone application.

Clock patches look OK to me. Can you resend them without the defconfig
and dts patches and address Matthias' question?

I'm not sure if I understand you. Do you prefer to have just the clock parts
send as an independent version so that you can easier apply the patches to your
tree?

Patch 2, 5, 6 and 7 should go through my tree.
So do you want a series with patches 1, 3 and 4?

Regards,
Matthias

Yup, I've got a little bit confused, too.
Should I separate and resend these patches into 2 patch sets?
The 1st patch set includes #1, #3, and #4?
And the other includes #2, #5, #6, and #7?

Yes please do so. I think that's what Stephen referred to.

If those are the ones that aren't dts or defconfig patches sounds good
to me.

Here comes the spilt patch sets.
1. [New] Add basic clock support for mt6765.
  https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11395997/
2. [PATCH v8] Add basic SoC support for mt6765
  https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11396019/
  But it's a little bit strange I cannot find patch v8's cover-letter
  in patchwork. Only records which patches has been taken from v7.
  If resend cover-letter is required please let me know.

Regards,
Macpaul Lin
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel