From: chenqiwu <redacted>
brcm_avs_cpufreq_get() calls cpufreq_cpu_get() to get cpufreq policy,
meanwhile, it also increments the kobject reference count of policy to
mark it busy. However, a corresponding call of cpufreq_cpu_put() is
ignored to decrement the kobject reference count back, which may lead
to a potential stuck risk that percpu cpuhp thread deadly waits for
dropping of kobject refcount when percpu cpufreq policy free.
The call trace of stuck risk could be:
cpufreq_online() //If cpufreq online failed, goto out_free_policy.
->cpufreq_policy_free() //Do cpufreq_policy free.
->cpufreq_policy_put_kobj()
->kobject_put() //Skip if policy kfref count is not 1.
->cpufreq_sysfs_release()
->complete() //Complete policy->kobj_unregister.
->wait_for_completion() //Wait for policy->kobj_unregister.
A simple way to avoid this stuck risk is use cpufreq_cpu_get_raw()
instead of cpufreq_cpu_get(), since this can be easily exercised by
attempting to force an unbind of the CPUfreq driver.
Signed-off-by: chenqiwu <redacted>
---
drivers/cpufreq/brcmstb-avs-cpufreq.c | 11 +++++++++--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/brcmstb-avs-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/brcmstb-avs-cpufreq.c
index 77b0e5d..6d2bf5c 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/brcmstb-avs-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/brcmstb-avs-cpufreq.c
@@ -452,8 +452,15 @@ static bool brcm_avs_is_firmware_loaded(struct private_data *priv)
static unsigned int brcm_avs_cpufreq_get(unsigned int cpu)
{
- struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
- struct private_data *priv = policy->driver_data;
+ struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(cpu);
+ struct private_data *priv;
+
+ if (!policy)
+ return 0;
+
+ priv = policy->driver_data;
+ if (!priv || !priv->base)
+ return 0;
return brcm_avs_get_frequency(priv->base);
}--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel