Thread (6 messages) 6 messages, 3 authors, 2020-02-03

Re: [PATCH v8 4/5] locking/qspinlock: Introduce starvation avoidance into CNA

From: Alex Kogan <hidden>
Date: 2020-01-30 22:06:35
Also in: linux-arch, lkml

On Jan 25, 2020, at 6:19 AM, Peter Zijlstra [off-list ref] wrote:

On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 01:19:05PM -0500, Alex Kogan wrote:
quoted
Is there a lightweight way to identify such a “prioritized” thread?
No; people might for instance care about tail latencies between their
identically spec'ed worker tasks.
I would argue that those users need to tune/reduce the intra-node handoff
threshold for their needs. Or disable CNA altogether.

In general, Peter, seems like you are not on board with the way Longman
suggested to handle prioritized threads. Am I right?

Thanks,
— Alex


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help