Re: [PATCH v9 0/5] Add NUMA-awareness to qspinlock
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Date: 2020-01-26 15:35:37
Also in:
linux-arch, lkml
On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 02:41:39PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
On 1/24/20 11:58 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:quoted
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 09:17:05PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:quoted
On 1/24/20 8:59 PM, Waiman Long wrote:quoted
quoted
You called it! I will play with QEMU's -numa argument to see if I can get CNA to run for me. Please accept my apologies for the false alarm. Thanx, PaulCNA is not currently supported in a VM guest simply because the numa information is not reliable. You will have to run it on baremetal to test it. Sorry for that.Correction. There is a command line option to force CNA lock to be used in a VM. Use the "numa_spinlock=on" boot command line parameter.As I understand it, I need to use a series of -numa arguments to qemu combined with the numa_spinlock=on (or =1) on the kernel command line. If the kernel thinks that there is only one NUMA node, it appears to avoid doing CNA. Correct? Thanx, PaulIn auto-detection mode (the default), CNA will only be turned on when paravirt qspinlock is not enabled first and there are at least 2 numa nodes. The "numa_spinlock=on" option will force it on even when both of the above conditions are false.
Hmmm... Here is my kernel command line taken from the console log: console=ttyS0 locktorture.onoff_interval=0 numa_spinlock=on locktorture.stat_interval=15 locktorture.shutdown_secs=1800 locktorture.verbose=1 Yet the string "Enabling CNA spinlock" does not appear. Ah, idiot here needs to enable CONFIG_NUMA_AWARE_SPINLOCKS in his build. Trying again with "--kconfig "CONFIG_NUMA_AWARE_SPINLOCKS=y"... Thanx, Paul _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel