HI Chen-Yu and Maxime,

Can you pick this up again?

Yangtao

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 4:08 AM Daniel Lezcano
[off-list ref] wrote:

On 09/01/2020 14:13, Maxime Ripard wrote:

quoted

Hi Daniel,

On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 12:51:27PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:

quoted

On 07/01/2020 08:58, Maxime Ripard wrote:

quoted

On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 05:46:39PM +0000, Yangtao Li wrote:

quoted

There are two sensors, sensor0 for CPU, sensor1 for GPU.

Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com>
Tested-on: sun8i-r40-bananapi-m2-ultra

As far as I know, tested-on is not documented anywhere (and isn't
really used either). I've removed it and applied, thanks!

I think this patch should go through my tree as it refers to a commit in
my branch.

I'm not quite sure to get why. Even though that patch depends on the
one affecting the driver to be functional, it doesn't break anything
when merged through arm-soc, and similarly yours doesn't affect any
other tree if it's merged through your tree, so there's no dependency?

Sorry, I puzzled myself, I thought you meant you applied patch 1/2


--
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel