On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 9:28 AM Tejun Heo [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 04:15:32PM +0100, Michal Koutný wrote:
quoted
PF_EXITING is set earlier than actual removal from css_set when a task
is exitting. This can confuse cgroup.procs readers who see no PF_EXITING
tasks, however, rmdir is checking against css_set membership so it can
transitionally fail with EBUSY.
Fix this by listing tasks that weren't unlinked from css_set active
lists.
It may happen that other users of the task iterator (without
CSS_TASK_ITER_PROCS) spot a PF_EXITING task before cgroup_exit(). This
is equal to the state before commit c03cd7738a83 ("cgroup: Include dying
leaders with live threads in PROCS iterations") but it may be reviewed
later.
Tested-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Yeah, this looks fine to me. Any chance you can order this before the
clean up so that we can mark it for -stable.
+1 for reordering. Makes it easier to backport.
Thanks,
Suren.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kernel-team+unsubscribe@android.com.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel