RE: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Make scmi core independent of transport type
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Date: 2020-01-13 06:45:40
Also in:
lkml
Hi Sudeep,
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Make scmi core independent of transport type On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 03:04:42PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:quoted
On 09-01-20, 09:18, Arnd Bergmann wrote:quoted
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 10:32 AM Viresh Kumar [off-list ref]wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
The SCMI specification is fairly independent of the transport protocol, which can be a simple mailbox (already implemented) oranything else.quoted
quoted
quoted
The current Linux implementation however is very much dependent of the mailbox transport layer. This patch makes the SCMI core code (driver.c) independent of the mailbox transport layer and moves all mailbox related code to a new file: mailbox.c. We can now implement more transport protocols to transport SCMI messages. The transport protocols just need to provide struct scmi_transport_ops, with its version of the callbacks to enable exchangeof SCMI messages.quoted
quoted
quoted
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>Conceptually I think this is fine, but as others have said, it would be better to have another transport implementation posted along with this to see if the interfaces actually work out.@Sudeep/Vincent: Do you think we can add another transport implementation something right away for it ?Even if we don't add new transport right away, I would like to see if the requirements are met. I will take a look at you v2 with that in mind anyways. We need not wait, we I want to see people think it meets their requirement. I will also add couple of guys working on virtio transport for SCMI when I respond to your v2. Thanks for posting it.quoted
@Peng ?Peng, Did you get a chance to try this with SMC ? If SCMI was the only usecase, you can try this approach instead of mailbox, now that no one has any objects to this approach conceptually. Please use v2 as base and update us.
I will try that, but might be a bit later. Thanks, Peng.
-- Regards, Sudeep
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel