Hi Peter,
Thank you for the patch.
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 12:42:35PM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
dma_request_slave_channel() is a wrapper on top of dma_request_chan()
eating up the error code.
By using dma_request_chan() directly the driver can support deferred
probing against DMA.
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Vinod, could you please pick this up ?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
---
drivers/media/platform/xilinx/xilinx-dma.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/xilinx/xilinx-dma.c b/drivers/media/platform/xilinx/xilinx-dma.c
index b211380a11f2..9ce515ff9c0a 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/xilinx/xilinx-dma.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/xilinx/xilinx-dma.c
@@ -725,10 +725,10 @@ int xvip_dma_init(struct xvip_composite_device *xdev, struct xvip_dma *dma,
/* ... and the DMA channel. */
snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "port%u", port);
- dma->dma = dma_request_slave_channel(dma->xdev->dev, name);
- if (dma->dma == NULL) {
+ dma->dma = dma_request_chan(dma->xdev->dev, name);
+ if (IS_ERR(dma->dma)) {
dev_err(dma->xdev->dev, "no VDMA channel found\n");
- ret = -ENODEV;
+ ret = PTR_ERR(dma->dma);
goto error;
}
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel