Re: [RFC 02/11] soc: Add Realtek chip info driver for RTD1195 and RTD1295
From: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
Date: 2020-01-02 14:39:24
Also in:
lkml
Am 02.01.20 um 15:29 schrieb James Tai:
Add Stanley Chang for review.
Did you forget to CC him? Note that this series needs updates once we apply my syscon patches.
quoted
Add a soc bus driver to print chip model and revision details. Revisions from downstream drivers/soc/realtek/rtd{119x,129x}/rtk_chip.c. Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> --- Naming: What to call the family vs. soc_id? drivers/soc/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/soc/Makefile | 1 + drivers/soc/realtek/Kconfig | 13 ++++ drivers/soc/realtek/Makefile | 2 + drivers/soc/realtek/chip.c | 164 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 181 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/soc/realtek/Kconfig create mode 100644 drivers/soc/realtek/Makefile create mode 100644 drivers/soc/realtek/chip.cdiff --git a/drivers/soc/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/Kconfig index833e04a7835c..06ae9d97321c 100644--- a/drivers/soc/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/soc/Kconfig@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ source "drivers/soc/imx/Kconfig" source "drivers/soc/ixp4xx/Kconfig" source "drivers/soc/mediatek/Kconfig" source "drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig" +source "drivers/soc/realtek/Kconfig" source "drivers/soc/renesas/Kconfig" source "drivers/soc/rockchip/Kconfig" source "drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig"diff --git a/drivers/soc/Makefile b/drivers/soc/Makefile index2ec355003524..1d55d838a342 100644--- a/drivers/soc/Makefile +++ b/drivers/soc/Makefile@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_XWAY) += lantiq/ obj-y += mediatek/ obj-y += amlogic/ obj-y += qcom/ +obj-y += realtek/ obj-y += renesas/ obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rockchip/ obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_SAMSUNG) += samsung/diff --git a/drivers/soc/realtek/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/realtek/Kconfig new filemode 100644 index 000000000000..be75c1889c61--- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/soc/realtek/Kconfig@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later if ARCH_REALTEK || +COMPILE_TEST + +config REALTEK_SOC + tristate "Realtek chip info" + default ARCH_REALTEK + select SOC_BUS + help + Say 'y' here to enable support for SoC info on Realtek RTD1195 and + RTD1295 SoC families. + If unsure, say 'n'. + +endifdiff --git a/drivers/soc/realtek/Makefile b/drivers/soc/realtek/Makefile newfile mode 100644 index 000000000000..49900273905b--- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/soc/realtek/Makefile@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later +obj-$(CONFIG_REALTEK_SOC) += chip.odiff --git a/drivers/soc/realtek/chip.c b/drivers/soc/realtek/chip.c new filemode 100644 index 000000000000..9d13422e9936--- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/soc/realtek/chip.c@@ -0,0 +1,164 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later +/* + * Realtek System-on-Chip info + * + * Copyright (c) 2017-2019 Andreas Färber */ + +#include <linux/io.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/of.h> +#include <linux/of_address.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/slab.h> +#include <linux/sys_soc.h> + +#define REG_CHIP_ID 0x0 +#define REG_CHIP_REV 0x4 + +struct rtd_soc_revision { + const char *name; + u32 chip_rev; +}; + +static const struct rtd_soc_revision rtd1195_revisions[] = { + { "A", 0x00000000 }, + { "B", 0x00010000 }, + { "C", 0x00020000 }, + { "D", 0x00030000 }, + { } +}; + +static const struct rtd_soc_revision rtd1295_revisions[] = { + { "A00", 0x00000000 }, + { "A01", 0x00010000 }, + { "B00", 0x00020000 }, + { "B01", 0x00030000 }, + { } +};
I believe the lower 16 bits are reserved, so we should only be comparing the upper 16.
quoted
+ +struct rtd_soc { + u32 chip_id; + const char *family; + const char *(*get_name)(struct device *dev, const struct rtd_soc *s); + const struct rtd_soc_revision *revisions; + const char *codename; +}; + +static const char *default_name(struct device *dev, const struct +rtd_soc *s) { + return s->family; +} + +static const struct rtd_soc rtd_soc_families[] = { + { 0x00006329, "RTD1195", default_name, rtd1195_revisions, "Phoenix" }, + { 0x00006421, "RTD1295", default_name, rtd1295_revisions, "Kylin" }, +};
Similarly here I believe the upper 16 bits are reserved, so we should only be comparing the lower 16, which should make it easier to stay within 80 characters per line. Regards, Andreas
quoted
+ +static const struct rtd_soc *rtd_soc_by_chip_id(u32 chip_id) { + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rtd_soc_families); i++) { + const struct rtd_soc *family = &rtd_soc_families[i]; + + if (family->chip_id == chip_id) + return family; + } + return NULL; +} + +static const char *rtd_soc_rev(const struct rtd_soc *family, u32 +chip_rev) { + if (family) { + const struct rtd_soc_revision *rev = family->revisions; + + while (rev && rev->name) { + if (rev->chip_rev == chip_rev) + return rev->name; + rev++; + } + } + return "unknown"; +} + +static int rtd_soc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { + const struct rtd_soc *s; + struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr; + struct soc_device *soc_dev; + struct device_node *node; + void __iomem *base; + u32 chip_id, chip_rev; + + base = of_iomap(pdev->dev.of_node, 0); + if (!base) + return -ENODEV; + + soc_dev_attr = kzalloc(sizeof(*soc_dev_attr), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!soc_dev_attr) + return -ENOMEM; + + chip_id = readl_relaxed(base + REG_CHIP_ID); + chip_rev = readl_relaxed(base + REG_CHIP_REV); + + node = of_find_node_by_path("/"); + of_property_read_string(node, "model", &soc_dev_attr->machine); + of_node_put(node); + + s = rtd_soc_by_chip_id(chip_id); + + soc_dev_attr->family = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "Realtek %s", + (s && s->codename) ? s->codename : + ((s && s->family) ? s->family : "Digital Home Center")); + + if (likely(s && s->get_name)) + soc_dev_attr->soc_id = s->get_name(&pdev->dev, s); + else + soc_dev_attr->soc_id = "unknown"; + + soc_dev_attr->revision = rtd_soc_rev(s, chip_rev); + + soc_dev = soc_device_register(soc_dev_attr); + if (IS_ERR(soc_dev)) { + kfree(soc_dev_attr->family); + kfree(soc_dev_attr); + return PTR_ERR(soc_dev); + } + + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, soc_dev); + + dev_info(soc_device_to_device(soc_dev), + "%s %s (0x%08x) rev %s (0x%08x) detected\n", + soc_dev_attr->family, soc_dev_attr->soc_id, chip_id, + soc_dev_attr->revision, chip_rev); + + return 0; +} + +static int rtd_soc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) { + struct soc_device *soc_dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); + + soc_device_unregister(soc_dev); + + return 0; +} + +static const struct of_device_id rtd_soc_dt_ids[] = { + { .compatible = "realtek,rtd1195-chip" }, + { } +}; + +static struct platform_driver rtd_soc_driver = { + .probe = rtd_soc_probe, + .remove = rtd_soc_remove, + .driver = { + .name = "rtd1195-soc", + .of_match_table = rtd_soc_dt_ids, + }, +}; +module_platform_driver(rtd_soc_driver); + +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Realtek SoC identification"); +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); -- 2.16.4 _______________________________________________ linux-realtek-soc mailing list linux-realtek-soc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-realtek-soc ------Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
-- SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg) _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel