Re: [PATCH v3 6/9] dt-bindings: sun6i-dsi: Add R40 DPHY compatible (w/ A31 fallback)
From: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Date: 2020-01-02 11:03:52
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-devicetree, lkml
From: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Date: 2020-01-02 11:03:52
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-devicetree, lkml
On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 06:35:25PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
The MIPI DSI PHY controller on Allwinner R40 is similar on the one on A31. Add R40 compatible and append A31 compatible as fallback. Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> --- Changes for v3: - update the binding in new yaml format .../devicetree/bindings/phy/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy.yaml | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy.yaml index 8841938050b2..0c283fe79402 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy.yaml@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ properties: oneOf: - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy - items: + - const: allwinner,sun8i-r40-mipi-dphy - const: allwinner,sun50i-a64-mipi-dphy - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy
This isn't doing what you say it does. Here you're stating that there's two valid values, one that is a single element allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy, and another which is a list of three elements allwinner,sun8i-r40-mipi-dphy, allwinner,sun50i-a64-mipi-dphy and allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy, in that order. Did you run make dtbs_check and dt_bindings_check? Maxime