Thread (15 messages) 15 messages, 4 authors, 2020-01-02

Re: [PATCH v5 2/8] dt-bindings: mailbox: Add a sun6i message box binding

From: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Date: 2019-12-26 10:13:15
Also in: linux-clk, linux-devicetree, lkml

Hi,

On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 01:45:08PM -0600, Samuel Holland wrote:
On 12/16/19 8:04 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
quoted
Hi,

On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 10:24:49PM -0600, Samuel Holland wrote:
quoted
This mailbox hardware is present in Allwinner sun6i, sun8i, sun9i, and
sun50i SoCs. Add a device tree binding for it. As it has only been
tested on the A83T, A64, H3/H5, and H6 SoCs, only those compatibles are
included.

Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
---
 .../mailbox/allwinner,sun6i-a31-msgbox.yaml   | 78 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/allwinner,sun6i-a31-msgbox.yaml
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/allwinner,sun6i-a31-msgbox.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/allwinner,sun6i-a31-msgbox.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..dd746e07acfd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/allwinner,sun6i-a31-msgbox.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mailbox/allwinner,sun6i-a31-msgbox.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Allwinner sunxi Message Box
+
+maintainers:
+  - Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
+
+description: |
+  The hardware message box on sun6i, sun8i, sun9i, and sun50i SoCs is a
+  two-user mailbox controller containing 8 unidirectional FIFOs. An interrupt
+  is raised for received messages, but software must poll to know when a
+  transmitted message has been acknowledged by the remote user. Each FIFO can
+  hold four 32-bit messages; when a FIFO is full, clients must wait before
+  attempting more transmissions.
+
+  Refer to ./mailbox.txt for generic information about mailbox device-tree
+  bindings.
+
+properties:
+  compatible:
+     items:
+      - enum:
+          - allwinner,sun8i-a83t-msgbox
+          - allwinner,sun8i-h3-msgbox
+          - allwinner,sun50i-a64-msgbox
+          - allwinner,sun50i-h6-msgbox
+      - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-msgbox
This will fail for the A31, since it won't have two compatibles but
just one.
You asked me earlier to only include compatibles that had been tested, so I did.
This hasn't been tested on the A31, so there's no A31-only compatible.
The binding is the description, and that description already matches
the A31 compatible, and it's completely abstract from whether we have
software to support it.

We have bindings that have no drivers in the tree for example, but are
just there to make the representation complete.

In this case, we shouldn't enable it in the A31 DTSI, but we should
document the binding properly.
quoted
quoted
+  '#mbox-cells':
+    const: 1
However, you should document what the argument is about?
Ok. "Number of cells used to encode a mailbox specifier" should work.
It's not really what I meant, what I meant is what is is that
specifier you're talking about here. The customers' mailbox properties
will have a phandle and a number: what is this number representing?

Maxime
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help