Re: [PATCH 7/9] memory: samsung: exynos5422-dmc: Replace deprecated 'devfreq-events' property
From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Date: 2019-12-17 11:04:06
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-pm, linux-rockchip, linux-samsung-soc, lkml
Hi Chanwoo, On 12/17/19 5:57 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
In order to remove the deprecated 'devfreq-events' property, replace with new 'exynos,ppmu-device' property in order to get the devfreq-event device in devicetree file instead of 'devfreq-events' property. But, to guarantee the backward-compatibility, keep the support 'devfreq-events' property. Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> --- .../memory-controllers/exynos5422-dmc.txt | 6 ++-- drivers/memory/samsung/exynos5422-dmc.c | 29 +++++++++++++++---- 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/exynos5422-dmc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/exynos5422-dmc.txt index 02e4a1f862f1..1e1b3702f045 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/exynos5422-dmc.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/exynos5422-dmc.txt@@ -17,14 +17,14 @@ Required properties for DMC device for Exynos5422: - clock-names : should include "fout_spll", "mout_sclk_spll", "ff_dout_spll2", "fout_bpll", "mout_bpll", "sclk_bpll", "mout_mx_mspll_ccore", "mout_mclk_cdrex" entries -- devfreq-events : phandles for PPMU devices connected to this DMC. +- exynos,ppmu-device : phandles for PPMU devices connected to this DMC. - vdd-supply : phandle for voltage regulator which is connected. - reg : registers of two CDREX controllers. - operating-points-v2 : phandle for OPPs described in v2 definition. - device-handle : phandle of the connected DRAM memory device. For more information please refer to documentation file: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ddr/lpddr3.txt -- devfreq-events : phandles of the PPMU events used by the controller. +- exynos,ppmu-device : phandles of the PPMU events used by the controller. - samsung,syscon-clk : phandle of the clock register set used by the controller, these registers are used for enabling a 'pause' feature and are not exposed by clock framework but they must be used in a safe way.@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ Example: "mout_mx_mspll_ccore", "mout_mclk_cdrex"; operating-points-v2 = <&dmc_opp_table>; - devfreq-events = <&ppmu_event3_dmc0_0>, <&ppmu_event3_dmc0_1>, + exynos,ppmu-device = <&ppmu_event3_dmc0_0>, <&ppmu_event3_dmc0_1>, <&ppmu_event3_dmc1_0>, <&ppmu_event3_dmc1_1>; device-handle = <&samsung_K3QF2F20DB>; vdd-supply = <&buck1_reg>;diff --git a/drivers/memory/samsung/exynos5422-dmc.c b/drivers/memory/samsung/exynos5422-dmc.c index c3195111d646..96593f37a478 100644 --- a/drivers/memory/samsung/exynos5422-dmc.c +++ b/drivers/memory/samsung/exynos5422-dmc.c@@ -1270,10 +1270,17 @@ static int exynos5_dmc_init_clks(struct exynos5_dmc *dmc) static struct devfreq_event_dev *get_edev_by_node(struct device_node *np, int index) { - struct device_node *node = of_parse_phandle(np, "devfreq-events", + struct device_node *node = of_parse_phandle(np, "exynos,ppmu-device", index); - if (!node) - return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); + if (!node) { + /* + * Check the deprecated 'devfreq-events' property + * to support backward-compatibility. + */ + node = of_parse_phandle(np, "devfreq-events", index); + if (!node) + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); + } return devfreq_event_get_edev_by_node(node); }@@ -1292,10 +1299,20 @@ static int exynos5_performance_counters_init(struct exynos5_dmc *dmc) int ret, i; dmc->num_counters = of_property_count_elems_of_size(dmc->dev->of_node, - "devfreq-events", sizeof(u32)); + "exynos,ppmu-device", sizeof(u32)); if (dmc->num_counters < 0) { - dev_err(dmc->dev, "could not get devfreq-event counters\n"); - return dmc->num_counters; + /* + * Check the deprecated 'devfreq-events' property + * to support backward-compatibility. + */ + dmc->num_counters = of_property_count_elems_of_size( + dmc->dev->of_node, + "devfreq-events", sizeof(u32)); + if (dmc->num_counters < 0) { + dev_err(dmc->dev, + "could not get devfreq-event counters\n"); + return dmc->num_counters; + } } counters_size = sizeof(struct devfreq_event_dev) * dmc->num_counters;
Looks good to me. The fallback with backward-compatibility is a good idea in my opinion. Thank you for the change and feel free to and my: Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Regarding the whole patch set, for the first glance it looks reasonable and good. AIRC some developers were arguing for the "devfreq-events" entry in DT. Now it should be fine. I will spend more time today for reviewing the whole patch set. Regards, Lukasz _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel