On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 03:54:06PM +0000, Steven Price wrote:
On 10/12/2019 11:23, kbuild test robot wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
include/linux/spinlock.h:378:9: sparse: sparse: context imbalance in 'walk_pte_range' - unexpected unlock
I believe this is a false positive (although the trace here is useless).
This patch adds a conditional lock/unlock:
pte = walk->no_vma ? pte_offset_map(pmd, addr) :
pte_offset_map_lock(walk->mm, pmd, addr, &ptl);
...
if (!walk->no_vma)
spin_unlock(ptl);
pte_unmap(pte);
I'm not sure how to match sparse happy about that. Is the only option to
have two versions of the walk_pte_range() function? One which takes the
lock and one which doesn't.
Yes.
-- Luc
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel