Re: [PATCH 1/5] pinctrl: actions: Use the correct style for SPDX License Identifier
From: Nishad Kamdar <hidden>
Date: 2019-12-05 14:49:01
Also in:
linux-amlogic, linux-gpio, linux-mediatek, linux-renesas-soc, lkml
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 10:02:08PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 27.11.19 um 17:40 schrieb Nishad Kamdar:quoted
This patch corrects the SPDX License Identifier style in header file related Actions Semi OWL pinctrl driver.Owl
I used the same format mentioned below, which also says OWL. Meybe we can change both of them in a separate patch.
quoted
For C header files Documentation/process/license-rules.rst mandates C-like comments (opposed to C source files where C++ style should be used). Changes made by using a script provided by Joe Perches here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/2/7/46. Suggested-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: Nishad Kamdar <redacted> --- drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.h b/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.h index dae2e8363fd5..feee7ad7e27e 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.h +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.h@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ */This is not a uapi or asm header, which that /* */ rule was later added for, I thought?
I might be wrong but I think it applies to this file too as there as there is a SPDX identifier in the first place.
quoted
/* * OWL SoC's Pinctrl definitions *Not objecting, just making sure we're not blindly refactoring code.
I am not sure what you are trying to say here, but the SPDX identifier requires an independent block comment. Hence placed the obove code in a separate block comment. Everything else is as it is.
If doing this, I suggest updating to GPL-2.0-or-later.
We can do this in a separate patch as this patch only talks about the style.
Regards, Andreas -- SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg)
Thanks very much for your time and review. Regards, Nishad _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel