Hi John,

On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 05:16:42PM -0800, John Stultz wrote:

On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 8:31 AM Catalin Marinas [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Shared and writable mappings (__S.1.) should be clean (!dirty) initially
and made dirty on a subsequent write either through the hardware DBM
(dirty bit management) mechanism or through a write page fault. A clean
pte for the arm64 kernel is one that has PTE_RDONLY set and PTE_DIRTY
clear.

The PAGE_SHARED{,_EXEC} attributes have PTE_WRITE set (PTE_DBM) and
PTE_DIRTY clear. Prior to commit 73e86cb03cf2 ("arm64: Move PTE_RDONLY
bit handling out of set_pte_at()"), it was the responsibility of
set_pte_at() to set the PTE_RDONLY bit and mark the pte clean if the
software PTE_DIRTY bit was not set. However, the above commit removed
the pte_sw_dirty() check and the subsequent setting of PTE_RDONLY in
set_pte_at() while leaving the PAGE_SHARED{,_EXEC} definitions
unchanged. The result is that shared+writable mappings are now dirty by
default

Fix the above by explicitly setting PTE_RDONLY in PAGE_SHARED{,_EXEC}.
In addition, remove the superfluous PTE_DIRTY bit from the kernel PROT_*
attributes.

Fixes: 73e86cb03cf2 ("arm64: Move PTE_RDONLY bit handling out of set_pte_at()")
Cc: <redacted> # 4.14.x-
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Hey,
  So I'm not yet sure why, but I've just validated that this patch is
causing trouble with booting AOSP on HiKey960 with 5.4-rc6 (-rc5 works
fine).

Hmm. Annoying this wasn't spotted by CI.

Its odd, because the system does boot and is alive, but seems to stall
out at the boot animation, and userland never finishes coming up to
the home screen. It just sits there without a useful error message
that I can find so far.  Reverting just this patch seems to solve it
and it boots all the way.

Given that I don't think the HiKey960 supports h/w DBM, my initial guess
is that the GPU is stuck on a page fault.

I'll try to dig further to see what might be going on (the mali driver
is a prime suspect here), but I wanted to raise the flag since we're
at the end of the -rc cycle.

What exactly are you using for the mali driver?

As an experiment, can you try reverting just the part of the patch that
removes PTE_DIRTY from the PROT_* definitions? (see below)

Thanks,

Will

--->8

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h
index 8dc6c5cdabe6..17a8eb13f4ce 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h

@@ -32,11 +32,11 @@
 #define PROT_DEFAULT		(_PROT_DEFAULT | PTE_MAYBE_NG)
 #define PROT_SECT_DEFAULT	(_PROT_SECT_DEFAULT | PMD_MAYBE_NG)
 
-#define PROT_DEVICE_nGnRnE	(PROT_DEFAULT | PTE_PXN | PTE_UXN | PTE_WRITE | PTE_ATTRINDX(MT_DEVICE_nGnRnE))
-#define PROT_DEVICE_nGnRE	(PROT_DEFAULT | PTE_PXN | PTE_UXN | PTE_WRITE | PTE_ATTRINDX(MT_DEVICE_nGnRE))
-#define PROT_NORMAL_NC		(PROT_DEFAULT | PTE_PXN | PTE_UXN | PTE_WRITE | PTE_ATTRINDX(MT_NORMAL_NC))
-#define PROT_NORMAL_WT		(PROT_DEFAULT | PTE_PXN | PTE_UXN | PTE_WRITE | PTE_ATTRINDX(MT_NORMAL_WT))
-#define PROT_NORMAL		(PROT_DEFAULT | PTE_PXN | PTE_UXN | PTE_WRITE | PTE_ATTRINDX(MT_NORMAL))
+#define PROT_DEVICE_nGnRnE	(PROT_DEFAULT | PTE_PXN | PTE_UXN | PTE_DIRTY | PTE_WRITE | PTE_ATTRINDX(MT_DEVICE_nGnRnE))
+#define PROT_DEVICE_nGnRE	(PROT_DEFAULT | PTE_PXN | PTE_UXN | PTE_DIRTY | PTE_WRITE | PTE_ATTRINDX(MT_DEVICE_nGnRE))
+#define PROT_NORMAL_NC		(PROT_DEFAULT | PTE_PXN | PTE_UXN | PTE_DIRTY | PTE_WRITE | PTE_ATTRINDX(MT_NORMAL_NC))
+#define PROT_NORMAL_WT		(PROT_DEFAULT | PTE_PXN | PTE_UXN | PTE_DIRTY | PTE_WRITE | PTE_ATTRINDX(MT_NORMAL_WT))
+#define PROT_NORMAL		(PROT_DEFAULT | PTE_PXN | PTE_UXN | PTE_DIRTY | PTE_WRITE | PTE_ATTRINDX(MT_NORMAL))
 
 #define PROT_SECT_DEVICE_nGnRE	(PROT_SECT_DEFAULT | PMD_SECT_PXN | PMD_SECT_UXN | PMD_ATTRINDX(MT_DEVICE_nGnRE))
 #define PROT_SECT_NORMAL	(PROT_SECT_DEFAULT | PMD_SECT_PXN | PMD_SECT_UXN | PMD_ATTRINDX(MT_NORMAL))

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel