Re: [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: iio: timer: Convert stm32 IIO trigger bindings to json-schema
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Date: 2019-11-09 12:43:10
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-iio, linux-pwm, lkml
On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 17:35:20 -0600 Rob Herring [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 1:52 PM Benjamin GAIGNARD [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 11/6/19 5:06 AM, Rob Herring wrote:quoted
On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 11:07:16AM +0100, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:quoted
Le dim. 3 nov. 2019 à 12:08, Jonathan Cameron [off-list ref] a écrit :quoted
On Thu, 31 Oct 2019 13:30:38 +0100 Benjamin Gaignard [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Convert the STM32 IIO trigger binding to DT schema format using json-schema Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <redacted>I'm far from great on these as still haven't taken the time I should to learn the yaml syntax properly. A few comments inline however based mostly on this doesn't quite look like other ones I've seen recently. Thanks, Jonathanquoted
--- .../bindings/iio/timer/st,stm32-timer-trigger.yaml | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++ .../bindings/iio/timer/stm32-timer-trigger.txt | 25 ------------ 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/timer/st,stm32-timer-trigger.yaml delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/timer/stm32-timer-trigger.txtdiff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/timer/st,stm32-timer-trigger.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/timer/st,stm32-timer-trigger.yaml new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..1c8c8b55e8cd --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/timer/st,stm32-timer-trigger.yaml@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) +%YAML 1.2 +--- +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/iio/timer/st,stm32-timer-trigger.yaml# +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# + +title: STMicroelectronics STM32 Timers IIO timer bindings + +maintainers: + - Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@st.com> + - Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com> + +properties: + $nodemane:nodename?That will be in v2No, $nodename is correct. The '$' signifies something we generate and add in. IOW, not a real property. I guess we could have used 'name' here and stuck with traditional OpenFirmware.let's go for $nameNo, $nodename is correct. You don't have a choice. That is what the tooling generates.
Sorry all, I caused confusion here. Was just trying to point out the typo! $node_m_ane :)
Rob
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel