On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 3:01 PM Maxime Ripard [off-list ref] wrote:

On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 07:49:08PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:

quoted

The MIPI DSI controller in Allwinner A64 is similar to A33.

But unlike A33, A64 doesn't have DSI_SCLK gating so it is valid
to with separate compatible for A64 on the same driver.

Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
---
 .../bindings/display/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dsi.yaml        | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dsi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dsi.yaml
index dafc0980c4fa..cfcc84d38084 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dsi.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dsi.yaml

@@ -15,7 +15,9 @@ properties:
   "#size-cells": true

   compatible:
-    const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dsi
+    enum:
+      - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dsi
+      - const: allwinner,sun50i-a64-mipi-dsi

How did you test this? It will report an error when running the
validation

I did follow the v9 comments [1] and forgot to do dt-doc-validate.
will send the v11 for this patch alone, will that be okay?

[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/307499/

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel