* Tero Kristo [off-list ref] [190903 08:15]:

On 03/09/2019 11:10, Rob Herring wrote:

quoted

I prefer that bindings be complete as possible even if driver support
is not there yet. Adding power domain support may only mean adding
'#power-domain-cells'.

The location is fine then.

Yeah, I assume just adding power-domain-cells should be enough. I am not too
sure before I start trying this out though so did not want to add it yet.

Should we call the device tree node name power-controller instead of
reset controller though? Most of the PRM instances do not have a
separate rstctrl reset control functionality.

Anybody got better any better naming in mind?

Regards,

Tony



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel