On 9/12/19 4:08 PM, Walter Wu wrote:

quoted

  extern void __reset_page_owner(struct page *page, unsigned int order);

diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.kasan b/lib/Kconfig.kasan
index 6c9682ce0254..dc560c7562e8 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.kasan
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.kasan

@@ -41,6 +41,8 @@ config KASAN_GENERIC
  	select SLUB_DEBUG if SLUB
  	select CONSTRUCTORS
  	select STACKDEPOT
+	select PAGE_OWNER
+	select PAGE_OWNER_FREE_STACK
  	help
  	  Enables generic KASAN mode.
  	  Supported in both GCC and Clang. With GCC it requires version 4.9.2

@@ -63,6 +65,8 @@ config KASAN_SW_TAGS
  	select SLUB_DEBUG if SLUB
  	select CONSTRUCTORS
  	select STACKDEPOT
+	select PAGE_OWNER
+	select PAGE_OWNER_FREE_STACK
  	help

What is the difference between PAGE_OWNER+PAGE_OWNER_FREE_STACK and
DEBUG_PAGEALLOC?

Same memory usage, but debug_pagealloc means also extra checks and 
restricting memory access to freed pages to catch UAF.

If you directly enable PAGE_OWNER+PAGE_OWNER_FREE_STACK
PAGE_OWNER_FREE_STACK,don't you think low-memory device to want to use
KASAN?

OK, so it should be optional? But I think it's enough to distinguish no 
PAGE_OWNER at all, and PAGE_OWNER+PAGE_OWNER_FREE_STACK together - I 
don't see much point in PAGE_OWNER only for this kind of debugging.

So how about this? KASAN wouldn't select PAGE_OWNER* but it would be 
recommended in the help+docs. When PAGE_OWNER and KASAN are selected by 
user, PAGE_OWNER_FREE_STACK gets also selected, and both will be also 
runtime enabled without explicit page_owner=on.
I mostly want to avoid another boot-time option for enabling 
PAGE_OWNER_FREE_STACK.
Would that be enough flexibility for low-memory devices vs full-fledged 
debugging?

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel