On 09/09/2019 13:59, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:

On 08/09/2019 17.25, Vinod Koul wrote:

quoted

On 30-07-19, 12:34, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:

quoted

+/**
+ * Descriptor header, present in all types of descriptors
+ */
+struct cppi5_desc_hdr_t {
+	u32 pkt_info0;	/* Packet info word 0 (n/a in Buffer desc) */
+	u32 pkt_info1;	/* Packet info word 1 (n/a in Buffer desc) */
+	u32 pkt_info2;	/* Packet info word 2 Buffer reclamation info */
+	u32 src_dst_tag; /* Packet info word 3 (n/a in Buffer desc) */

Can we move these comments to kernel-doc style please

Sure, I'll move all struct and enums.

quoted

quoted

+/**
+ * cppi5_desc_get_type - get descriptor type
+ * @desc_hdr: packet descriptor/TR header
+ *
+ * Returns descriptor type:
+ * CPPI5_INFO0_DESC_TYPE_VAL_HOST
+ * CPPI5_INFO0_DESC_TYPE_VAL_MONO
+ * CPPI5_INFO0_DESC_TYPE_VAL_TR
+ */
+static inline u32 cppi5_desc_get_type(struct cppi5_desc_hdr_t *desc_hdr)
+{
+	WARN_ON(!desc_hdr);

why WARN_ON and not return error!

these helpers were intended to be as simple as possible.
I can go through with all of the WARN_ONs and replace them with if()
pr_warn() and either just return or return with 0.

Would that be acceptable?

This should never happens in working system unless there is buggy code.
I think It can be just removed

-- 
Best regards,
grygorii

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel