Re: [PATCH] ACPI: support for NXP i2c controller
From: Andy Shevchenko <hidden>
Date: 2019-09-02 21:16:26
Also in:
linux-acpi, linux-i2c, lkml
On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 11:58 PM Rafael J. Wysocki [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 12:35 PM Chuanhua Han [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Enable NXP i2c controller to boot with ACPI Signed-off-by: Meenakshi Aggarwal <redacted> Signed-off-by: Udit Kumar <redacted> Signed-off-by: Chuanhua Han <redacted>Wolfram, any objections to this from the i2c side?
May I propose amendment(s)?
quoted
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ #include <linux/pm_runtime.h> #include <linux/sched.h> #include <linux/slab.h>
quoted
+#include <linux/acpi.h>
If it's kept in order, better to go with it. (Yes, it is as I have checked) However, property.h should be included instead, see below.
quoted
const struct of_device_id *of_id = of_match_device(i2c_imx_dt_ids, &pdev->dev); + const struct acpi_device_id *acpi_id = + acpi_match_device(i2c_imx_acpi_ids, + &pdev->dev);
quoted
if (of_id) i2c_imx->hwdata = of_id->data; + else if (acpi_id) + i2c_imx->hwdata = (struct imx_i2c_hwdata *) + acpi_id->driver_data;
The above altogher may be replaced with const struct imx_i2c_hwdata *match; ... match = device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev); if (match) i2c_imx->hwdata = match; else ...
quoted
+ .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(i2c_imx_acpi_ids),
Since there is no #ifdef guard no need to use ACPI_PTR(). -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel