On 2019-08-29 13:50, Marco Felsch wrote:

On 19-08-29 09:11, Robin Gong wrote:

quoted

On 2019-08-29 16:17, Marco Felsch wrote:

quoted

quoted

quoted

While reading the rm it seems that
the snvs block has a dedicated version register. IMHO this could be
a better way to apply the change also to existing devices with old
firmware.

I thought the same thing, and fully agree with you. However I do not
have a way to determine which versions are out there. Since I couldn't
find any documentation on this, and I only have i.MX6 S/DL, D/Q and UL

laying around.

@NXP Kernel Team
Can we get some more information here?

Go ahead, please. That snvs version register SNVS_HPVIDR1 should work 
as expect.
MINOR_REV checking is enough, none-zero means for soc after i.mx6sx, 
but
Zero means i.mx6q/dl/sl elder soc.

Thanks. Robin can you integrate that so we can drop the different
dt-handling?

No problem, I'll post an updated patch tomorrow.

Regards,
  Marco

quoted

quoted

Regards,
  Marco

quoted

Regards,
Robin van der Gracht

--
Pengutronix e.K.                           |
|
Industrial Linux Solutions                 |
https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.p
engutronix.de%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cyibin.gong%40nxp.com%7C8d4e1
0cd77bd4652f3eb08d72c594e76%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7
C0%7C0%7C637026634390359345&sdata=mhXlUxmLWg8qtwhPQfkJZm
VAn4QQ3YybLOSh83uf27E%3D&reserved=0  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0
|
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:
+49-5121-206917-5555 |

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel