Hi Frank/Matthias,

On Fri, 2019-08-23 at 19:16 +0200, Frank Wunderlich wrote:

quoted

Gesendet: Freitag, 23. August 2019 um 17:42 Uhr
Von: "Matthias Brugger" [off-list ref]

quoted

I suppose that's because 3/10 has code that should be in 2/10 and for some
reason 3/10 was not pushed for linux-next inclusion. Although it has the same
Acked-for-mfd-by tag.

@Frank, can you test if adding 3/10 to your code base fixes the issue?

adding part 3 [1] seems to fix the issue too

[    4.960051] mt6323-regulator mt6323-regulator: Chip ID = 0x2023

thanks

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11110509/

Thanks for your comments.
The root cause seems I didn't split the code well.
I will fix it in the next version.


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel