Thread (20 messages) 20 messages, 4 authors, 2019-08-26

Re: [PATCH v4 01/14] dt-bindings: Add binding for MT2712 MIPI-CSI2

From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi>
Date: 2019-08-26 14:05:49
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-media, linux-mediatek, lkml

On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 04:58:02PM +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 4:51 PM CK Hu [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Hi, Tomasz:

On Mon, 2019-06-10 at 12:32 +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote:
quoted
Hi CK, Stu,

On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 11:34 AM CK Hu [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Hi, Stu:

"mediatek,mt2712-mipicsi" and "mediatek,mt2712-mipicsi-common" have many
common part with "mediatek,mt8183-seninf", and I've a discussion in [1],
so I would like these two to be merged together.

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10979131/
Thanks CK for spotting this.

I also noticed that the driver in fact handles two hardware blocks at
the same time - SenInf and CamSV. Unless the architecture is very
different from MT8183, I'd suggest splitting it.

On a general note, the MT8183 SenInf driver has received several
rounds of review comments already, but I couldn't find any comments
posted for this one.

Given the two aspects above and also based on my quick look at code
added by this series, I'd recommend adding MT2712 support on top of
the MT8183 series.
In [1], "mediatek,mt8183-seninf" use one device to control multiple csi
instance, so it duplicate many register definition. In [2], one
"mediatek,mt2712-mipicsi" device control one csi instance, so there are
multiple device and the register definition does not duplicate.
I guess we didn't catch that in the review yet. It should be fixed.
quoted
You
recommend adding MT2712 support on top of the MT8183 series, do you mean
that "mediatek,mt2712-mipicsi" should use one device to control multiple
csi instance and duplicate the register setting?
There are some aspects of MT8183 series that are done better than the
MT2712 series, but apparently there are also some better aspects in
MT2712. We should take the best aspects of both series. :)
Stu: Are the two devices similar enough or not; does this look like a
feasible approach to you?

-- 
Sakari Ailus

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help