Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: mmc: Document Aspeed SD controller
From: Andrew Jeffery <hidden>
Date: 2019-08-22 11:55:13
Also in:
linux-aspeed, linux-devicetree, linux-mmc, lkml
On Thu, 22 Aug 2019, at 21:15, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 at 07:37, Andrew Jeffery [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Thu, 15 Aug 2019, at 15:06, Joel Stanley wrote:quoted
On Wed, 7 Aug 2019 at 00:38, Andrew Jeffery [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
The ASPEED SD/SDIO/MMC controller exposes two slots implementing the SDIO Host Specification v2.00, with 1 or 4 bit data buses, or an 8 bit data bus if only a single slot is enabled. Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <redacted>Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> Two minor comments below.quoted
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/aspeed,sdhci.yaml@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-laterNo "Copyright IBM" ?I'm going rogue. That reminds me I should chase up where we got to with the binding licensing.quoted
quoted
+%YAML 1.2 +---quoted
+ +examples: + - | + #include <dt-bindings/clock/aspeed-clock.h> + sdc@1e740000 { + compatible = "aspeed,ast2500-sd-controller"; + reg = <0x1e740000 0x100>; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <1>; + ranges = <0 0x1e740000 0x10000>;According to the datasheet this could be 0x20000. It does not matter though, as there's nothing in it past 0x300.Good catch.Are you planning on sending a v6 or you want me to apply this and you can post a patch on top?
Yeah, sorry, I wasn't very clear there. I was hoping just to do a follow-up patch with the cleanups if you're okay with that? Andrew _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel