Quoting Miquel Raynal (2019-07-27 01:53:30)

I know this series might have side effects despite the consequent
amount of time spent to write and test it, but I also think the
clk subsystem would really benefit from such change and handling
suspend to RAM support would be greatly enhanced. You seemed
interested at first and now not anymore, could I know why? I got
inspired by the regulators subsystem. It is not an idea of mine
that device links should be bring to clocks. Regulators are almost
as used as clocks so I really understand your fears but why not
applying this to -next very early during the -rc cycles and see
what happens? You'll have plenty of time to ask me to fix things
or even drop it off.

Ok, I'm back on this topic. Let me look at the latest code and see how
it works on a qcom platform I have in hand. If the device links look OK
then it should be good. I also want to make sure we're not holding a
nested pile of locks when we're adding the device links so that we don't
get some weird lockdep problems.


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel