The structs representing capacity states and performance domains of an
Energy Model are currently only defined for CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL=y. That
makes it hard for code outside PM_EM to manipulate those structures
without a lot of ifdefery or stubbed accessors.

So, move the declaration of the two structs outside of the
CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL ifdef. The client code (e.g. EAS or thermal) always
checks the return of em_cpu_get() before using it, so the exising code
is still safe to use as-is.

Reported-by: kbuild test robot <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <redacted>
---
 include/linux/energy_model.h | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/energy_model.h b/include/linux/energy_model.h
index 73f8c3cb9588..d249b88a4d5a 100644
--- a/include/linux/energy_model.h
+++ b/include/linux/energy_model.h

@@ -9,7 +9,6 @@
 #include <linux/sched/topology.h>
 #include <linux/types.h>
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL
 /**
  * em_cap_state - Capacity state of a performance domain
  * @frequency:	The CPU frequency in KHz, for consistency with CPUFreq

@@ -40,6 +39,7 @@ struct em_perf_domain {
 	unsigned long cpus[0];
 };
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL
 #define EM_CPU_MAX_POWER 0xFFFF
 
 struct em_data_callback {

@@ -160,7 +160,6 @@ static inline int em_pd_nr_cap_states(struct em_perf_domain *pd)
 }
 
 #else
-struct em_perf_domain {};
 struct em_data_callback {};
 #define EM_DATA_CB(_active_power_cb) { }
 

-- 
2.22.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel