[PATCH v4 4/6] coresight: etm4x: improve clarity of etm4_os_unlock comment
From: Andrew Murray <hidden>
Date: 2019-07-30 12:53:20
Subsystem:
arm/coresight framework and drivers, hardware tracing facilities, the rest · Maintainers:
Suzuki K Poulose, Alexander Shishkin, Linus Torvalds
To improve clarity, let's update the comment for etm4_os_unlock to use the name of the register as per the ETM architecture specification. The existing comment is also misleading as it suggests any value written to TRCOSLAR unlocks the trace registers, however it must be '0' - let's also correct this. Signed-off-by: Andrew Murray <redacted> Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> --- drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c
index 615bdbf7c9b7..a128b5063f46 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ static enum cpuhp_state hp_online; static void etm4_os_unlock(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata) { - /* Writing any value to ETMOSLAR unlocks the trace registers */ + /* Writing 0 to TRCOSLAR unlocks the trace registers */ writel_relaxed(0x0, drvdata->base + TRCOSLAR); drvdata->os_unlock = true; isb();
--
2.21.0
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel