Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: debug: Remove rcu_read_lock from debug exception
From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Date: 2019-07-19 08:42:21
Also in:
lkml
Hi, On 7/18/19 3:31 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jul 2019 10:20:23 +0100 Mark Rutland [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 11:22:15PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:quoted
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 02:43:58PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:quoted
Remove rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() from debug exception handlers since the software breakpoint can be hit on idle task.Why precisely do we need to elide these? Are we seeing warnings today?Yes, unfortunately, or fortunately. Naresh reported that warns when ftracetest ran. I confirmed that happens if I probe on default_idle_call too. /sys/kernel/debug/tracing # echo p default_idle_call >> kprobe_events /sys/kernel/debug/tracing # echo 1 > events/kprobes/enable /sys/kernel/debug/tracing # [ 135.122237] [ 135.125035] ============================= [ 135.125310] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
[ 135.132224] Call trace: [ 135.132491] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x140 [ 135.132806] show_stack+0x24/0x30 [ 135.133133] dump_stack+0xc4/0x10c [ 135.133726] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xf8/0x108 [ 135.134171] call_break_hook+0x170/0x178 [ 135.134486] brk_handler+0x28/0x68 [ 135.134792] do_debug_exception+0x90/0x150 [ 135.135051] el1_dbg+0x18/0x8c [ 135.135260] default_idle_call+0x0/0x44 [ 135.135516] cpu_startup_entry+0x2c/0x30 [ 135.135815] rest_init+0x1b0/0x280 [ 135.136044] arch_call_rest_init+0x14/0x1c [ 135.136305] start_kernel+0x4d4/0x500
quoted
quoted
The exception entry and exit use irq_enter() and irq_exit(), in this case, correct? Otherwise RCU will be ignoring this CPU.This is missing today, which sounds like the underlying bug.Agreed. I'm not so familier with how debug exception is handled on arm64, would it be a kind of NMI or IRQ?
Debug exceptions can interrupt both SError (think: machine check) and pseudo-NMI, which both in turn interrupt interrupt-masked code. So they are a kind of NMI. But, be careful not to call 'nmi_enter()' twice, see do_serror() for how we work around this...
Anyway, it seems that normal irqs are also not calling irq_enter/exit except for arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c:gic_handle_irq() either calls handle_domain_irq() or handle_IPI(). The enter/exit calls live in those functions. Thanks, James _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel