Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mm: Enable CONFIG_NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES by default for NUMA
From: Hoan Tran OS <hoan@os.amperecomputing.com>
Date: 2019-07-12 10:56:54
Also in:
linux-mm, linux-s390, linuxppc-dev, lkml, sparclinux
Hi, On 7/12/19 2:02 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Thu 11-07-19 23:25:44, Hoan Tran OS wrote:quoted
In NUMA layout which nodes have memory ranges that span across other nodes, the mm driver can detect the memory node id incorrectly. For example, with layout below Node 0 address: 0000 xxxx 0000 xxxx Node 1 address: xxxx 1111 xxxx 1111 Note: - Memory from low to high - 0/1: Node id - x: Invalid memory of a node When mm probes the memory map, without CONFIG_NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES config, mm only checks the memory validity but not the node id. Because of that, Node 1 also detects the memory from node 0 as below when it scans from the start address to the end address of node 1. Node 0 address: 0000 xxxx xxxx xxxx Node 1 address: xxxx 1111 1111 1111 This layout could occur on any architecture. This patch enables CONFIG_NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES by default for NUMA to fix this issue.Yes it can occur on any arch but most sane platforms simply do not overlap physical ranges. So I do not really see any reason to unconditionally enable the config for everybody. What is an advantage?
As I observed from arch folder, there are 9 arch support NUMA config. ./arch/ia64/Kconfig:387:config NUMA ./arch/powerpc/Kconfig:582:config NUMA ./arch/sparc/Kconfig:281:config NUMA ./arch/alpha/Kconfig:557:config NUMA ./arch/sh/mm/Kconfig:112:config NUMA ./arch/arm64/Kconfig:841:config NUMA ./arch/x86/Kconfig:1531:config NUMA ./arch/mips/Kconfig:2646:config NUMA ./arch/s390/Kconfig:441:config NUMA And there are 5 arch enables CONFIG_NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES with NUMA arch/powerpc/Kconfig:637:config NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES arch/sparc/Kconfig:299:config NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES arch/x86/Kconfig:1575:config NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES arch/s390/Kconfig:446:config NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES arch/arm64 (which I intended to enable in the original patch) It would be good if we can enable it by-default. Otherwise, let arch enables it by them-self. Do you have any suggestions? Thanks Hoan _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel