Thread (15 messages) 15 messages, 5 authors, 2019-06-19

RE: [RFC PATCH 2/2] ACPI / PPTT: cacheinfo: Label caches based on fw_token

From: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <hidden>
Date: 2019-06-17 08:29:24
Also in: linux-acpi

Hi James,
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
-----Original Message-----
From: linux-arm-kernel [mailto:linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org]
On Behalf Of James Morse
Sent: 05 October 2018 16:03
To: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Vijaya Kumar K <redacted>; Lorenzo Pieralisi
[off-list ref]; Jeffrey Hugo [off-list ref]; Sudeep
Holla [off-list ref]; Jeremy Linton [off-list ref];
Tomasz Nowicki [off-list ref]; James Morse
[off-list ref]; Richard Ruigrok [off-list ref];
Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo) [off-list ref]; wangxiongfeng (C)
[off-list ref]; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 2/2] ACPI / PPTT: cacheinfo: Label caches based on
fw_token

The resctrl ABI requires caches to have a unique id. This number must be
unique across all caches at this level, but doesn't need to be contiguous. (there
may be gaps, it may not start at 0).
See Documentation/x86/intel_rdt_ui.txt::Cache IDs

We want a value that is the same over reboots, and should be the same on
identical hardware, even if the PPTT is generated in a different order. The
hardware doesn't give us any indication of which caches are shared, so this
information must come from firmware tables.

Starting with a cacheinfo's fw_token, we walk the table to find all CPUs that
share this cpu_node (and thus cache), and take the lowest physical id to use as
the id for the cache. On arm64 this value corresponds to the MPIDR.

This is only done for unified caches, as instruction/data caches would generate
the same id using this scheme.

Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h |  6 +++
 drivers/acpi/pptt.c           | 81
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 87 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
index 709208dfdc8b..16b9b3d771a8 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
@@ -53,6 +53,12 @@ static inline void __iomem
*acpi_os_ioremap(acpi_physical_address phys,  typedef u64 phys_cpuid_t;
#define PHYS_CPUID_INVALID INVALID_HWID

+/* Shift the relevant bits out of u64 phys_cpuid_t into a u32 */
+#define ARCH_PHYSID_TO_U32(x) (u32)(MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(x, 0)
	|\
+			MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(x, 1) << MPIDR_LEVEL_BITS  |\
+			MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(x, 2) << 2*MPIDR_LEVEL_BITS|\
+			MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(x, 3) << 3*MPIDR_LEVEL_BITS)
+
 #define acpi_strict 1	/* No out-of-spec workarounds on ARM64 */
 extern int acpi_disabled;
 extern int acpi_noirq;
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c index
d1e26cb599bf..9478f8c28158 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
@@ -341,6 +341,84 @@ static struct acpi_pptt_cache
*acpi_find_cache_node(struct acpi_table_header *ta
 /* total number of attributes checked by the properties code */  #define
PPTT_CHECKED_ATTRIBUTES 4

+/**
+ * acpi_pptt_min_physid_from_cpu_node() - Recursivly find @min_physid
+for all
+ * leaf CPUs below @cpu_node.
+ * @table_hdr:	Pointer to the head of the PPTT table
+ * @cpu_node:	The point in the toplogy to start the walk
+ * @min_physid:	The min_physid to update with leaf CPUs.
+ */
+void acpi_pptt_min_physid_from_cpu_node(struct acpi_table_header
*table_hdr,
+					struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu_node,
+					phys_cpuid_t *min_physid)
+{
+	bool leaf = true;
+	u32 acpi_processor_id;
+	phys_cpuid_t cpu_node_phys_id;
+	struct acpi_subtable_header *iter;
+	struct acpi_pptt_processor *iter_node;
+	u32 target_node = ACPI_PTR_DIFF(cpu_node, table_hdr);
+	u32 proc_sz = sizeof(struct acpi_pptt_processor *);
+	unsigned long table_end = (unsigned long)table_hdr +
+table_hdr->length;
+
+	/*
+	 * Walk the PPTT, looking for nodes that reference cpu_node
+	 * as parent.
+	 */
+	iter = ACPI_ADD_PTR(struct acpi_subtable_header, table_hdr,
+			     sizeof(struct acpi_table_pptt));
+
+	while ((unsigned long)iter + proc_sz < table_end) {
+		iter_node = (struct acpi_pptt_processor *)iter;
+
+		if (iter->type == ACPI_PPTT_TYPE_PROCESSOR &&
+		    iter_node->parent == target_node) {
+			leaf = false;
+			acpi_pptt_min_physid_from_cpu_node(table_hdr, iter_node,
+							   min_physid);
+		}
+
+		if (iter->length == 0)
+			return;
+		iter = ACPI_ADD_PTR(struct acpi_subtable_header, iter,
+				    iter->length);
+	}
+
+	if (leaf && cpu_node->flags & ACPI_PPTT_ACPI_PROCESSOR_ID_VALID) {
+		acpi_processor_id = cpu_node->acpi_processor_id;
+		cpu_node_phys_id = acpi_id_to_phys_cpuid(acpi_processor_id);
+		*min_physid = min(*min_physid, cpu_node_phys_id);
+	}
+}
I was just trying out the latest public MPAM branch available here[1] and noted that
on our HiSilicon platform all the L3 cache were labeled with the same Id. Debugging
revealed that the above leaf node check was removed in this branch[2] which makes
the min_physid calculation going wrong. Just wondering is there any particular reason
for removing the check or the branch is not carrying the latest patch?

Please let me know.

Thanks,
Shameer

1. http://www.linux-arm.org/git?p=linux-jm.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/mpam/snapshot/may
2. http://www.linux-arm.org/git?p=linux-jm.git;a=commitdiff;h=413eb4281b072e1ee60f88b814f2a418358f2155;hp=44f0d62a6e00f8da7f04ab9e0673340e6c67ae65

quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+static void acpi_pptt_label_cache(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf) {
+	acpi_status status;
+	struct acpi_table_header *table;
+	struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu_node;
+	phys_cpuid_t min_physid = PHYS_CPUID_INVALID;
+
+	/* Affinity based IDs for non-unified caches would not be unique */
+	if (this_leaf->type != CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED)
+		return;
+
+	if (!this_leaf->fw_token)
+		return;
+	cpu_node = this_leaf->fw_token;
+
+	status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_PPTT, 0, &table);
+	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
+		return;
+
+	acpi_pptt_min_physid_from_cpu_node(table, cpu_node, &min_physid);
+	acpi_put_table(table);
+
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(min_physid == PHYS_CPUID_INVALID);
+
+	this_leaf->id = ARCH_PHYSID_TO_U32(min_physid);
+	this_leaf->attributes |= CACHE_ID;
+}
+
 /**
  * update_cache_properties() - Update cacheinfo for the given processor
  * @this_leaf: Kernel cache info structure being updated @@ -408,6 +486,9
@@ static void update_cache_properties(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf,
 	if (this_leaf->type == CACHE_TYPE_NOCACHE &&
 	    valid_flags == PPTT_CHECKED_ATTRIBUTES)
 		this_leaf->type = CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED;
+
+	/* Now that the type is known, try and generate an id. */
+	acpi_pptt_label_cache(this_leaf);
 }

 static void cache_setup_acpi_cpu(struct acpi_table_header *table,
--
2.18.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help