Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] kbuild: compile-test kernel headers to ensure they are self-contained
From: Masahiro Yamada <hidden>
Date: 2019-06-30 07:58:27
Also in:
bpf, linux-kbuild, linux-mediatek, lkml, netdev
Hi Sam, On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 3:01 AM Sam Ravnborg [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Masahiro. On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 01:39:02AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:quoted
The headers in include/ are globally used in the kernel source tree to provide common APIs. They are included from external modules, too. It will be useful to make as many headers self-contained as possible so that we do not have to rely on a specific include order. There are more than 4000 headers in include/. In my rough analysis, 70% of them are already self-contained. With efforts, most of them can be self-contained. For now, we must exclude more than 1000 headers just because they cannot be compiled as standalone units. I added them to header-test-. The black list was mostly generated by a script, so should be checked later.The list is smaller than I had expected. And I see why you insisted on avoiding a maze ok Kbuild files. It looks good, except there is a few issues.. The file kernel/kheaders_data.tar.xz includes all the .s files. Something needs to be done to exclude the .s files...
Good catch. I will change scripts/gen_kheaders.sh
When building a full kernel the build fails like this: LD vmlinux.o aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: cannot find include/lib.a: No such file or directory make[1]: *** [/home/sam/kernel/linux-kbuild.git/Makefile:1054: vmlinux] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/sam/kernel/linux-kbuild.git/.build/arm64-allyesconfig' make: *** [Makefile:179: sub-make] Error 2
My bad - I built only include/, without testing full build. I will fix.
include/uapi/linux/mman.h fails when building sparc64 allmodconfig. There is likely more header files that will fail when we start to throw this after diverse randconfigs. I have no good idea how to catch this. Unless your scripts could automate this across several architectures.
Thanks. I excluded a little more headers.
I did not continue my testing futher.quoted
+header-test- += uapi/drm/vmwgfx_drm.h +header-test- += uapi/linux/a.out.h +header-test- += uapi/linux/coda.h...quoted
+header-test- += uapi/xen/evtchn.h +header-test- += uapi/xen/gntdev.h +header-test- += uapi/xen/privcmd.hI though uapi files were covered by another Makefile? If they are added because we pull them in using a pattern, maybe they should be removed using a specific filer-out?
I have not looked at this closely yet. usr/include/Makefile tests UAPI headers crafted by scripts/headers_install.sh Testing UAPI headers in their raw form makes sense, I think. -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel